As a healthcare consultant who uses the tools and techniques
of geographic information systems (GIS), I am interested in the professionalism
of the consulting industry but also the extent to which those of us who use GIS
are viewed as professionals and not just analysts.
I recently completed reading two articles of
interest – David DiBiase’s “Strengthening the GIS Profession” in the Summer
2012 issue of ArcNews (
http://www.esri.com/news/arcnews/summer12articles/strengthening-the-gis-profession.html)
and Alan Butler’s article in the Urban and Regional Information Systems
Association (URISA) publication The GIS Professional titled “Directing URISA
into the Future: A Proposal for Discussion” (
http://www.urisa.org/files/julyaug2012.pdf).
Alan’s article is written as commentary but I believe he
makes several valid points as to the direction URISA must take in order to be
the relevant professional organization for GIS professionals. While I appreciate David’s comments, I don’t
believe he goes far enough (which may simply reflect the amount of space
available in ArcNews). Alan goes further
and does a nice job of laying out what he believes the future of URISA should
look like. However, I would encourage
the board of URISA to consider going even further.
When I mention to people that I belong to URISA (“eww
Rissa”), they look at me like I have three heads! Perhaps it’s time for a change in the
organization’s name to something like GISTA (Geospatial Information Systems
& Technology Association). I believe
this better reflects a more broadly defined profession for those of us who use
the technology and better reflects the certifications (GIS Certification
Institute) and accreditations that Alan calls for. It’s also more consistent with the US
Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration (DOLETA) Geospatial
Technology Competency Model (GTCM) that David mentions in his article.
What do you think?